BLAKE BAGGETT | DIALED IN




Blake Baggett’s 2017 season has shown promise and progression without a doubt. He made the switch to Rocky Mountain ATV-MC/WPS/KTM and has been working hard on his ranch in Florida for training. After a quiet year in 2016, he made his presence known throughout Supercross despite being labeled an outdoor only rider. With this in mind, many predicted he’d do exceptionally well when the 2017 Lucas Oil Pro Motocross Series got under way. After four motos, he’s proving those predictions right. We had a chat with Baggett this week to talk about his season so far.  
Your first rounds have gone pretty well, are you happy with the first two rounds?
I’m happy with my fourth moto for sure, the first three motos I was getting my feet under me and figured out where I was going to be. We’ve got the bike figured out, I definitely hadn’t ridden it a lot outdoors, but now we’re figuring that out and making a lot of changes. First moto at Glen Helen I just didn’t feel like I rode to my full capabilities, then the second moto I got a good start and had a really good moto. I got to lead a few laps and figure out what the lead pace was going to be. After that, I got into second, but we were still running a really good pace. Looking back at all the lap times and watching all of the videos, I’m pretty happy with where we’re at and we’re also going to make some more changes this week to be a little more comfortable in some areas that I think I can be better in. We’ll give it heck at Colorado and we’re definitely looking to get some moto wins and overall wins. That’s the goal.



Like you said, leading those laps has to be huge to get in the mindset.
For sure, it’s been a long time since I’ve gotten a chance to get out front. I got a decent start and then I was able to pass for the lead. I felt comfortable out front; I just didn’t have the exact pace. I had a fast pace looking at lap times, I was second fastest, but Jason had me in some areas and I was more than willing to let him take that and chock up some good points. There are 20 more motos to go and it’s going to be a long year. I think we’re in a good spot right now and things are going to shuffle like they do. I think we’re going to do what we did this weekend more and more. It’s going to be a crazy year.
Do you think that mentality comes with age? Would a younger Blake Baggett feel the need to win that moto?
Yeah, maybe. It’s just getting smart. I think everybody would like to say that, and I think that I am. I feel comfortable and confident in my abilities, I just have to get back to my old self and what I was actually capable of doing. I know I can do that again. It’s still in there and if you can do it once, you can do it multiple times. Sometimes as you get older and things change, you have to adjust and change with it.



You’re heading to Florida soon, are you excited to get back there?
We’re definitely headed to Florida after this weekend so I’d like to have a good weekend here at Thunder Valley and then get back to the ranch. I’m excited to get back there. That’s country living at its finest and El Chupacabra Ranch has come a long way. It’s something that I enjoy doing and I have fun doing it, whether it’s ranch work or whatever it is around there. I just enjoy being there and being away from the city. That’s my happy place.
Do you think the first two tracks were more challenging and rough than normal?
The first track [Hangtown] had lots of ruts and you had to make sure you were on point and ready for that. I don’t think I was as ready for that. At a certain point, you run out of time and go with what you’ve got. At the same time as you get in and you start racing you start to figure it out. That’s when you figure out what areas you like and what areas you’re not so much a fan of. That one was nothing but long ruts, the dirt was hard and crusty. It started really muddy in the morning and then everything dried so it was crusty and hard. It was a weird track to get a flow on. This past weekend at Glen Helen it was really rough and the braking bumps were massive. It was leftover down the hills from amateur days. Things started out as rough as possible and then we continuously tore it up all day.

Some people said it was safer that way.
I think it is. Some people made some comments about it being dangerous, but it’s dangerous when it’s in between and there are a few big bumps, but you’re still going fast. I think it was so rough that the speeds were slower down the hills.
Last year was pretty crazy; the track changes seemed safer as well.
For sure, the track was safer. The jumps weren’t as big. I think people want to go back to old motocross. There are too many jumps involved and there’s not enough natural terrain where motocross started. I think that’s what they need to go back to.
What’s your favorite track to go to?
I like Thunder Valley and Budds Creek a lot. Millville has been good to me. Washougal is kind of hit or miss, but some years it’s really fun. I’d say Budds Creek is probably the one that sticks out the most to me. It’s one of those tracks that no matter what you’re having fun with all of the elevation changes and the obstacles. There’s big jumps and small jumps and off cambers. That’s what I tried to mimic with my ranch in Florida.

Read more at http://motocross.transworld.net/news/blake-baggett-dialed-in/#2TgetGJXrZcfWJRy.99

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Best Bathroom Scales

What Is Coal's Future?

On the face of it, coal is under fire from all sides. Subsidies for the world's dirtiest fuel are being phased out by rich nations. Local governments are also on a warpath against the commodity. For example, the mayor of New York City is trying to convince the city's pension funds to divest their coal holdings, which amount to about $33 million. Global demand is also slowing down. The Energy and Information Administration projects lower domestic coal consumption and exports because of the entry of other, major coal producers from the developing world. The Environmental Protection Agency is also cracking down on the industry with regulations, such as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS), which has resulted in the closure of a number of coal-fired plants. Natural gas is increasingly replacing coal as the fuel of choice for electricity. According to EIA forecasts, the share of natural gas in generating electricity is forecast to increase to 30% from 27%. And yet things are not as bad they seem. Coal is expected to be the largest source of fuel for generating electricity in the United States by the end of this decade. Even as it predicted lower domestic coal consumption, the EIA report projected that coal production in the U.S. will remain relatively constant over the next three decades. That is because coal represents a cheap and viable source for economic development in developing markets, such as China and India. Given these mixed signals, what then is coal's future? Why Coal Fell Out Of Favor Coal's declining fortunes are a contrast to its earlier status as the fuel of choice. The black rock, as it is popularly known, has been used as an energy source since prehistoric times. It was the invention of the steam locomotive, which was used to ferry coal stacks to different regions, that propelled coal to the center stage of energy choices. Although the industrial revolution started in Britain – it was there that the steam engine was invented, coal made helped the U.S. immensely. Pittsburgh coal mines powered the country's own industrial revolution before the two world wars. The country became the world's largest producer and exporter of coal. After a post-war boom in the 1950s, coal's fortunes began to decline during the 1960s, when alternate sources of fuel, such as oil, became popular. It has been a downhill ride since then. There were just 1,300 coal mines in the country in 2011, down from 9,331 in 1923, when the National Mining Association began measuring industry statistics. The number of workers in the coal industry declined by 87.5% during the same time period. The precipitous change was mainly brought about by the realization of coal's adverse effects on the planet's health. A number of studies over the years have confirmed the culpability of coal in raising global temperatures. The fuel is responsible for emissions of 1.7 billion metric tons a year of carbon dioxide out of the 5.3 billion tons that the U.S. emits annually. In addition to public pressure and government regulations, high operational costs, competition from other fuels and sliding prices have buffeted the coal industry. (See Also: How To Trade In Falling Coal Prices.) The problem is especially acute in the U.S., where 24 coal-mining companies have closed in the last three years alone. For example, the Appalachian coal-mining region became a flash point during the 2012 election cycle, when presidential candidate Mitt Romney blamed the region's problems on EPA regulations. In reality, a combination of cheaper imports from Colombia, rising labor costs and less productive mines brought about the closure of mines there. Mining costs at Powder River Basin, which account for over 40% of America's coal reserves, are comparatively cheaper. But those costs have been rising. The news for exports isn't that good, either. China powered much of the demand for coal in recent years and is the world's largest producer. (See Also: What Country Is The World's Largest Coal Producer?) But the Middle Kingdom is already working to reduce its reliance on coal. In addition, a deep dive in its economy has affected a global commodity slowdown, affecting a diverse swathe of commodity exporters. India is the other big coal consumer, but uses its internal reserves to fire up its economy. Is This Coal's Endgame? Even though it is besieged from all sides, coal still packs a powerful punch in sheer numbers. In fact, according to a report by research firm Wood Mackenzie, coal is expected to surpass oil as the dominant fuel by the end of this decade. Consider this: At 36 quadrillion British thermal units, oil has the maximum standby capacity among all fuels. Despite the forces stacked up against it, coal still ranks third in that list with a capacity of 26 quads. In an essay two years ago, Armond Cohen, director of the Clean Air Task Force, made a persuasive case for coal. “Coal will be central to economic modernization in the developing world, where most energy supply will be built in the next three decades. People who wish otherwise, and simply hope for the demise of coal are not facing the facts,” he wrote. Subsequently, Cohen listed three facts – the role of coal in aiding development in emerging markets, such as China and India, which is expected to become the largest importer of coal by 2020; the relatively miniscule capacity generation by alternate renewable energy sources; and the emergence of new technologies that remove carbon from coal, such as sequestration – to bolster his argument. (See Also: Why Coal Deserves Your Attention Right Now.) The Bottom Line Based on available evidence, it is certain that we are moving away from a world where coal is the primary source of energy to one characterized by a diversified and renewable energy mix. But coal's death won't occur suddenly. Coal's decline will be slow and measured because much of the world is still economically dependent on the fuel as a cheap source of energy. Read more: What Is Coal's Future? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/101315/what-coals-future.asp#ixzz4ivSJVM5p Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook