The Best Wireless Workout Headphones


If I wanted a pair of wireless headphones for working out, I’d get the JLab Epic2 Bluetooth. After extensive research—we considered a total of 147 sport-specific headphones and tested the 85 best-reviewed and newest options—our panel of experts agreed that they’d want to bring the Epic2 Bluetooth along on their next training session. The tough, lightweight Epic2 pair is easier to fit in a wider variety of ears than the competition, has better battery life than the other Bluetooth models we tested, and offers great sound for a lower price than most comparable cordless models. Many other headphones we tested not only had lackluster sound quality but also lacked in comfort and stability. The Epic2 is on the lower end of the price range for Bluetooth water-resistant headphones, as well. And because this model supports Bluetooth, you have no cord to get in the way of whatever it is you do to stay in shape.

Of all the models we tested, we think the JLab Epic2 Bluetooth is the best set of wireless workout headphones for most people headed for the gym or outdoors. These headphones are stable, sturdy, and sealed to block out distractions. And although we usually get a lot of conflicting reports from our testers on fit, this JLab pair worked for all of our panelists equally well. In fact, while many other sport headphones have a serious learning curve when it comes to setup, this JLab model was intuitive and easy to pop on right out of the box.
The Epic2 headphones also sound great, and they survived our stress testing. We listened to them, ran with them, got them wet, kicked them, tugged them, stomped them, and then listened to them again. After our endurance tests, we’re confident that these headphones can take what you throw at them. Plus, our testing confirmed their claimed 12-hour battery life, meaning you can get nearly two weeks’ worth of workouts from a single charge.
If you don’t like hooks over your ears, or if the JLab pair is sold out, the Jaybird X2 is the way to go. These headphones feel light, they stay put, they sound fantastic, they have a lifetime warranty against sweat damage (which, if you sweat through one pair of headphones a year, can really add up!), they charge pretty quickly (in around two hours), they have a nice case, and you can wear them several ways, depending on what works for you. However, getting the fit correct the first time takes a little more patience than with our top pick. As a result, in this test group the JLab Epic2 edged out the Jaybird X2 once again, but only barely.
Different workout styles demand different kinds of sport headphones, however, so if you need something a little different, we’ve got the bases covered. More on those below.

What makes a good pair of exercise headphones

In general, exercise headphones are for people who want to run, hike, bike, or hit the gym while listening to music, podcasts, or other media. Such headphones should be able to withstand a variety of stressors such as sweat, rain, strain from media players dropping to the floor, and abuse from being thrown into a bag along with potentially dirty and damp equipment.
Wireless headphones are for people who:
  1. Get annoyed by cables when working out—Nothing more irritating to you than a cord smacking your face when you’re kicking butt on the treadmill? Wireless is for you.
  2. Don’t mind having to remember to charge their headphones—If you work out several hours a week, you’ll need to charge about once a week or every other week for most sport models.
  3. Are willing to pay a little extra for the convenience—Wireless headphones generally cost a bit more money for the same quality of sound you’d get from similar wired versions.
So wireless headphones aren’t for everyone, and we totally get that. Many of you don’t want to be bothered with keeping a pair of exercise headphones charged — you’d rather be able to grab and go. You might be perfectly happy running a cable under your workout clothes, or you’re just looking for something for lower-impact activities anyway. Or you don’t want to spend the money on something that’s going to get sweaty. Don’t worry, we’ve got a guide to wired exercise headphones too.
Whatever type of exercise headphones you choose, they should sound decent. But headphones that sound fantastic and win a group listening panel are functionally useless if they don’t feel good, stay put, and keep out of the way when you’re being active. That means you have to make sure they fit your ears well and have a long enough or short enough cord (or none at all) to accommodate the exercise routines you prefer.
If you’re currently using a pair of earbuds that aren’t specifically designed for working out, such as Apple’s OEM EarPods, or if you’re using a nicer pair of earbuds for your workouts, you’ll have a better experience with one of our exercise picks. Workout headphones will take more abuse than EarPods and are designed to stay in your ears during activities. And unlike expensive headphones made only for casual use, sport headphones are created to handle sweat. Most important, many non-sport headphones have warranties that will become void if you get them wet—if you sweat and they short out prematurely, you’re out of luck.

The right headphones for your workout

We recognize that some workouts require headphones with specific features. To that end, we’ve made recommendations in nine distinct subcategories over two guides, including budget recommendations in the wired categories: sealed headphones (the headphones you’re probably used to, the kind that block out sound), in both Bluetooth and wired versions; unsealed headphones (designed to let in some sound from outside, for anyone who doesn’t like getting hit by cars while running), in both Bluetooth and wired versions; on-ear and over-ear headphones (for anyone who doesn’t like the feeling of earbuds); and swimming headphones (for anyone who dislikes land-based workouts).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Best Bathroom Scales

On the face of it, coal is under fire from all sides. Subsidies for the world's dirtiest fuel are being phased out by rich nations. Local governments are also on a warpath against the commodity. For example, the mayor of New York City is trying to convince the city's pension funds to divest their coal holdings, which amount to about $33 million. Global demand is also slowing down. The Energy and Information Administration projects lower domestic coal consumption and exports because of the entry of other, major coal producers from the developing world. The Environmental Protection Agency is also cracking down on the industry with regulations, such as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS), which has resulted in the closure of a number of coal-fired plants. Natural gas is increasingly replacing coal as the fuel of choice for electricity. According to EIA forecasts, the share of natural gas in generating electricity is forecast to increase to 30% from 27%. And yet things are not as bad they seem. Coal is expected to be the largest source of fuel for generating electricity in the United States by the end of this decade. Even as it predicted lower domestic coal consumption, the EIA report projected that coal production in the U.S. will remain relatively constant over the next three decades. That is because coal represents a cheap and viable source for economic development in developing markets, such as China and India. Given these mixed signals, what then is coal's future? Why Coal Fell Out Of Favor Coal's declining fortunes are a contrast to its earlier status as the fuel of choice. The black rock, as it is popularly known, has been used as an energy source since prehistoric times. It was the invention of the steam locomotive, which was used to ferry coal stacks to different regions, that propelled coal to the center stage of energy choices. Although the industrial revolution started in Britain – it was there that the steam engine was invented, coal made helped the U.S. immensely. Pittsburgh coal mines powered the country's own industrial revolution before the two world wars. The country became the world's largest producer and exporter of coal. After a post-war boom in the 1950s, coal's fortunes began to decline during the 1960s, when alternate sources of fuel, such as oil, became popular. It has been a downhill ride since then. There were just 1,300 coal mines in the country in 2011, down from 9,331 in 1923, when the National Mining Association began measuring industry statistics. The number of workers in the coal industry declined by 87.5% during the same time period. The precipitous change was mainly brought about by the realization of coal's adverse effects on the planet's health. A number of studies over the years have confirmed the culpability of coal in raising global temperatures. The fuel is responsible for emissions of 1.7 billion metric tons a year of carbon dioxide out of the 5.3 billion tons that the U.S. emits annually. In addition to public pressure and government regulations, high operational costs, competition from other fuels and sliding prices have buffeted the coal industry. (See Also: How To Trade In Falling Coal Prices.) The problem is especially acute in the U.S., where 24 coal-mining companies have closed in the last three years alone. For example, the Appalachian coal-mining region became a flash point during the 2012 election cycle, when presidential candidate Mitt Romney blamed the region's problems on EPA regulations. In reality, a combination of cheaper imports from Colombia, rising labor costs and less productive mines brought about the closure of mines there. Mining costs at Powder River Basin, which account for over 40% of America's coal reserves, are comparatively cheaper. But those costs have been rising. The news for exports isn't that good, either. China powered much of the demand for coal in recent years and is the world's largest producer. (See Also: What Country Is The World's Largest Coal Producer?) But the Middle Kingdom is already working to reduce its reliance on coal. In addition, a deep dive in its economy has affected a global commodity slowdown, affecting a diverse swathe of commodity exporters. India is the other big coal consumer, but uses its internal reserves to fire up its economy. Is This Coal's Endgame? Even though it is besieged from all sides, coal still packs a powerful punch in sheer numbers. In fact, according to a report by research firm Wood Mackenzie, coal is expected to surpass oil as the dominant fuel by the end of this decade. Consider this: At 36 quadrillion British thermal units, oil has the maximum standby capacity among all fuels. Despite the forces stacked up against it, coal still ranks third in that list with a capacity of 26 quads. In an essay two years ago, Armond Cohen, director of the Clean Air Task Force, made a persuasive case for coal. “Coal will be central to economic modernization in the developing world, where most energy supply will be built in the next three decades. People who wish otherwise, and simply hope for the demise of coal are not facing the facts,” he wrote. Subsequently, Cohen listed three facts – the role of coal in aiding development in emerging markets, such as China and India, which is expected to become the largest importer of coal by 2020; the relatively miniscule capacity generation by alternate renewable energy sources; and the emergence of new technologies that remove carbon from coal, such as sequestration – to bolster his argument. (See Also: Why Coal Deserves Your Attention Right Now.) The Bottom Line Based on available evidence, it is certain that we are moving away from a world where coal is the primary source of energy to one characterized by a diversified and renewable energy mix. But coal's death won't occur suddenly. Coal's decline will be slow and measured because much of the world is still economically dependent on the fuel as a cheap source of energy. Read more: What Is Coal's Future? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/101315/what-coals-future.asp#ixzz4ivSJVM5p Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook

The Best Lenovo Laptops of 2017